I think the "rules" can be useful in that they help you notice things you wouldn't otherwise notice.
Yes, passive verbs can reduce the power of actions. Yes, too many "-ing" verb phrases can become boring and repetitive. But I think eventually you'll get to a point in your writing when you instinctively know when using the passive or using an "-ing" verb phrase feels right.
I like to use repetition in my writing. I find it creates a rhythm, and that rhythm can be a poetic and powerful thing. But then I get critiques from less experienced writers who think I've made a mistake. Repetition as a style choice? That's not something they learned in the writing classes they took. Surely, repetition is redundant and should be avoided at all cost.
But I know better.
I know it works for what I'm trying to achieve, and so I know how to break the "rule."
So in the end, don't get rid of telling just because it's telling and the "rules" say you show. Don't get rid of passive words because the rules say they're bad. And don't get rid of "-ing" or "to be" phrases because someone told you should avoid them at all cost. Look at your story. Do these things work in your story? Do they help you achieve what you want to achieve? If they do, let the so-called "rules" be damned.
Shevi
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
The Top-Secret Guide to Creating Winning Titles!
jpg.jpg)
If you're a writer, you might have heard that the title you give your work in progress doesn't matter. "Whatever title you come up with," people say, "the publishing house will choose something different."
While that may often be true, the title you put on your manuscript does matter.
I've heard editors say they sometimes throw out the first two chapters of a manuscript they're editing, because the story doesn't really start until chapter three. Does that mean it's okay to start your manuscript with two boring chapters? No. Chances are that--outside of a one-on-one critique with an editor at a writers' conference or workshop--the editor will never get to chapter three if the editor is bored by chapter one. In fact, most editors won't read past a boring first page. Sure this is something the editor can fix, but isn't it easier for the editor to just slip it into that SASE with a rejection slip?
Your job as a writer is to make it easier for the editor to accept your manuscript, rather than reject it. So start with a compelling first chapter--and a compelling first page! Polish that manuscript until it shines! And, for goodness sakes, give it a title that makes a person can't wait to start reading it!
We live in an age of soundbites and Twitter tweets. We're used to having our attention grabbed in just a few well chosen words. And that is what your title should be: a few well chosen words that grab the reader's attention, like someone grabbing you by the collar and staring you in the face.
So what are the secrets to writing a great title? Here are a few.
While that may often be true, the title you put on your manuscript does matter.
I've heard editors say they sometimes throw out the first two chapters of a manuscript they're editing, because the story doesn't really start until chapter three. Does that mean it's okay to start your manuscript with two boring chapters? No. Chances are that--outside of a one-on-one critique with an editor at a writers' conference or workshop--the editor will never get to chapter three if the editor is bored by chapter one. In fact, most editors won't read past a boring first page. Sure this is something the editor can fix, but isn't it easier for the editor to just slip it into that SASE with a rejection slip?
Your job as a writer is to make it easier for the editor to accept your manuscript, rather than reject it. So start with a compelling first chapter--and a compelling first page! Polish that manuscript until it shines! And, for goodness sakes, give it a title that makes a person can't wait to start reading it!
We live in an age of soundbites and Twitter tweets. We're used to having our attention grabbed in just a few well chosen words. And that is what your title should be: a few well chosen words that grab the reader's attention, like someone grabbing you by the collar and staring you in the face.
So what are the secrets to writing a great title? Here are a few.
- Choose a familiar phrase. Playwright Neil Simon said that using familiar phrases, like All American Girl and The Odd Couple as the titles of his plays made people say, "I've heard of that. Must be a play people are talking about." One of my most successful manuscripts so far has the title Ride of Your Life, and I know the title has played a big part in its success. (Of course, these should be familiar phrases, and not familiar titles. You don't want the editor to say, "I've read that before.") You can also use a play on words based on a familiar phrase for the same result, for example, Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Starfish or Apple of His Sigh.
- Keep it short. Brevity is the soul of wit.
- Use words that excite. (Shh . . . I've got a secret. We all know what exciting words are. Secret. Passion. Escape. Wonder. Sin. Exciting words make us want to read further. Now you know. And, by the way, one of my works-in-progress is titled The Secret Life of Mira Levy. Please don't tell anyone. It's a secret.)
- Promise the reader something the reader wants. How to Write a Novel in 30 Days. Writing the Breakout Novel. If you want to do these things, what choice do you have but to read these books?
- Create sensory images in the reader's mind. The Golden Compass. The Sorcerer's Stone. Can you see them in your mind's eye? Can you feel them in your hand? Do you want to? If your title creates an image of something the reader will want to reach into your story and pull out, you've got a good title.
- Use a pleasureable action word. Scientists have discovered that action words touch the same parts of our brains as preforming these actions. When we read Dances with Wolves a part of our brains is actually dancing. Pretty cool, huh? Imagine the things your title could be making a part of the reader's brain do, things the reader would enjoy doing so much that he or she would feel compelled to read your story. Make pleasureable action words work for you.
- Make the reader wonder. Up the Down Staircase. What is a down staircase? Who is going up it and why? The reader will have to open the book to find the answers to these questions.
Use these tips individually or combined to help you create irresistable titles that will hook the reader and compel him or her to start reading your manuscript. After that, your story is on its own.
Shevi
Sunday, August 23, 2009
JPG Twitter template
Saturday, August 1, 2009
Just My Imogen and the Library Books

Imogen has got me in trouble again.
I don't know if you know Imogen. She's a fairy, and she lives with me in her little fairy house, which looks something like an ivy covered lantern. She's adorable, with her tiny little wings and big blue eyes, but she's always getting into trouble and dragging me along with her.
Well, today Imogen pulled a library book out of her house and informed me it was overdue. I didn't even know she had a library card. So I opened the book, and (I don't know why this should surprise me) I discovered it was over two years overdue.
"Imogen," I said with a sigh, "why didn't you return this two years ago?"
"How could I?" she replied. "I only finished reading it yesterday."
"Do you have any other books from the library?"
"No."
So of course I looked in her little fairy house, and of course I found six other books in there. I told her we had to return all of them.
"Can't," she said. "I haven't read those yet."
But I took the books back to the library, with Imogen darting in and out of my backpack trying to pull books out the entire way. I didn't know how I was going to explain this to the librarian. I hoped that she had a troublesome fairy, and that maybe she would understand.
So I got to the library and put the book in the book return slot. Then I tried to sneak out before the librarian noticed me, but no luck there.
"These are over two years overdue," she told me.
"I know." I sighed.
"Don't worry," she said. "You won't have to pay two years worth of fines for seven books. We never charge more than the price of the books."
"Oh, good."
So she looked the books up on her computer, and, surprise, surprise, turns out they were each rare collector fairy books, so I was better off paying the fines instead.
"That will be $532.80," the librarian said.
"Imogen!" I shouted, forgetting for a moment that I was in a library.
"You heard the woman," Imogen said. "Pay up."
So I wrote a check and, grumbling, gave it the librarian. To my surprise, the librarian squealed with delight and hugged me.
"Thank you," she shouted, "for keeping these books for so long!"
All the other librarians rushed over to see what was going on. The first librarian showed them the check, and the rest of them hugged me with tears in their eyes. One of them said, "Thank you so much! With all the government cutbacks, we rely on overdue books to pay our bills. You've saved our library! Thank you!"
Then they all thanked me over and over, and then two of them started to arrange a party in my honor. Apparently next week they'll be renaming the library after me.
Imogen of course is annoyed, because she thinks she should get the credit. After all, I wouldn't have written that check if she hadn't kept those books for over two years. And she's also upset with me because I took some of those books back before she had a chance to read them. In addition, I made her give me her library card, so this doesn't happen again.
Before we left the library, I used my own card to take out a book. It's How to Ditch Your Fairy by Justine Larbalestier. I don't really plan to ditch Imogen, but I wanted to teach her a lesson. She was really cross when she saw me reading it, but now it's gone and disappeared. I was right in the middle of a really good part, too. I've looked everywhere for that book.
I wonder what could have . . .
Imogen!
Monday, July 27, 2009
Random Funny Thoughts #1
Some people think the British aren't romantic. It isn't true. My English husband still knows how to make my heart race after over fifteen years of marriage. He does it by driving on the left-hand side of the road.
Monday, July 13, 2009
TWO JEWISH MOTHERS (a comedy skit by Shevi Arnold)
Two Jewish Mothers
a comedy skit
by
Shevi Arnold
SCENE: TWO JEWISH OLD LADIES, FLO AND MIRIAM, SIT BY A SMALL, ROUND KITCHEN TABLE. THE TABLE HAS A LACY TABLECLOTH AND FLOWERS ON IT. THEY ARE SIPPING TEA AND EATING CAKE.
FLO: So did I tell you want happened last night?
MIRIAM: Something happened?
FLO: I heard a sound it middle of the night. Woke me up. It was a burglar.
MIRIAM: No, really? You don't say.
FLO: I swear, there was a burglar in my living room.
MIRIAM: What did you do?
FLO: Well, I didn't want to be rude.
MIRIAM: No, of course not.
FLO: So I offered him a cup of coffee and a piece of cake.
MIRIAM: (Nodding) Of course, you have a guest, you have to give him something.
FLO: So we sat down and had a nice chat.
MIRIAM: What did you talk about?
FLO: I asked him, "What do you want my silverware for?"
MIRIAM: What did he say?
FLO: He said he was going to sell it. I told him he could have the candlesticks that used to sit over there on the mantel instead. You know, the big ones my mother-in-law gave me at my wedding. I always hated those things.
MIRIAM: (Looks around) I noticed that chair your husband usually sits in is missing.
FLO: (Nodding) I told him to take that too. And you know how I'm always complaining about the stuff my son left here when he went way to college?
MIRIAM: Like all those old comic books and baseball stuff?
FLO: The burglar was nice enough to take those too.
MIRIAM: Imagine that.
(Long pause as the women sip their tea.)
MIRIAM: So then he left?
FLO: Well, I couldn't let him go without giving him something to eat on the way home, now could I? You should have seen him! Nothing but skin and bones. So I gave him some potato kugal and
roast beef. And some chocolate rugelah.
MIRIAM: Oh, I love your rugelah.
FLO: I'll give you some to take home. I made plenty.
MIRIAM: And that was that? He left?
FLO: Not quite. I asked him if he was married.
MIRIAM: Was he?
FLO: No, so I'm setting him up with my daughter. They're going out Thursday night.
MIRIAM: (There's a long pause. Miriam blinks and looks concerned.) Are you sure that's a good idea?
FLO: I know, I know. She's going to find something wrong with him. She always does. That girl is so picky, she'll never get married.
MIRIAM: (Frowns at Flo in silence for a long time) Well, if things don't work out...
FLO: Yes?
MIRIAM: Could you send him to my place?
(FLO nods and sips her tea, while MIRIAM smiles)
Friday, July 10, 2009
Why I Hate Secrets in Stories
Some writers use secrets in an attempt to keep the reader hooked. The main character has this big secret, and you need to stick around to find out what that secret is. Some readers like that.
I'm not one of them.
I actually hate it when the main character has a secret. Hate it.
This is the way I see it. When the main character has a secret, it feels like I'm playing a game with someone who is playing by a different set of rules than I am. The deck is stacked in the writer and the main character's favor. They're hiding their cards. They both know what cards they have, and they're showing them to each other and laughing at me because they know something I don't know. And I don't know it, because they're the ones making the rules, and their rules say I can't know this "big secret," which is apparently a secret only to me.
I find this particularly annoying when the book seems to be about nothing other than the secret. It's the sort of thing that can get me to close a book within the first few pages. The writer has to show me all of his or her cards. If not, I'm going to find another writer who will.
I'm okay if the main character's secret is one the main character doesn't know, for example, if the main character is in denial. That's okay. I get to see all the cards the main character can see, and that means the rules of the game are fair.
The best thing to keep me hooked, though, isn't a secret at all: it's the need to find out how the main character will resolve his or her conflict.
Make me invested in the main character. Make me want what the main character wants as much as the main character wants it, and make me need to find out how the main character does or doesn't get it. That's all a writer needs to keep me hooked.
I'm not one of them.
I actually hate it when the main character has a secret. Hate it.
This is the way I see it. When the main character has a secret, it feels like I'm playing a game with someone who is playing by a different set of rules than I am. The deck is stacked in the writer and the main character's favor. They're hiding their cards. They both know what cards they have, and they're showing them to each other and laughing at me because they know something I don't know. And I don't know it, because they're the ones making the rules, and their rules say I can't know this "big secret," which is apparently a secret only to me.
I find this particularly annoying when the book seems to be about nothing other than the secret. It's the sort of thing that can get me to close a book within the first few pages. The writer has to show me all of his or her cards. If not, I'm going to find another writer who will.
I'm okay if the main character's secret is one the main character doesn't know, for example, if the main character is in denial. That's okay. I get to see all the cards the main character can see, and that means the rules of the game are fair.
The best thing to keep me hooked, though, isn't a secret at all: it's the need to find out how the main character will resolve his or her conflict.
Make me invested in the main character. Make me want what the main character wants as much as the main character wants it, and make me need to find out how the main character does or doesn't get it. That's all a writer needs to keep me hooked.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
